Content Feed Comments Feed

Phinally Philly

Sports analysis and newspheed.

Is Ryan Howard Worth $54 Mil?

Posted by David Foley On February - 9 - 2009

The Phillies avoided arbitration with first baseman Ryan Howard on Sunday by agreeing to a 3-year $54 million deal with the 29-year-old slugger. Most Philly fans will probably be glad the team finally locked up the former MVP to a new deal, but if you look a little closer this wasn’t as much of a no-brainer as you might think.

Let me re-phrase that: Ryan Howard is not worth the kind of money he is now making.

Now you might be saying to yourself, “This Foley guy is nuts! Howard is an offensive beast and one of the best left-handed power hitters in the game!” That much is certainly hard to deny. The big guy hit 48 homers and drove in 146 runs last season (yet somehow wasn’t an All-Star) and he was a big part of the Phils run to the World Series. Here’s the kicker…a closer look at Howard’s 2008 season shows when the Phillies needed him the most he folded faster than MIT students at an origami competition.

I know I mentioned above Howard’s impressive offensive numbers, but there was one stat that many Phillies fans are undoubtedly familiar with. RyHo hit at just a .251 clip over the course of the season, and he struggled mightily early on. Here’s a look a Howard’s batting average month-by-month:

March/April: .172

May: .238

June: .234

July: .311

August: .213

Sept/Oct: .352

I will give Ryan credit for his performance in September and October, but those monthly numbers really bring into question his consistency. Can Howard be counted on to carry a team? Only if he isn’t having a bad month. What about his batting statistics on an inning-by-inning basis?

Innings 1-3 (210 AB):  .305 (BA), .380 (OBP), 21 HR/67 RBI, 28 BB, 55 K

Innings 4-6 (213 AB): .296, .362, 18/54, 22, 64

Innings 7-9 (177 AB): .141, .263, 9/25, 27, 76

Innings 10+ (10 AB): .100, .357, 4, 4 (all 4 walks were intentional).

What do those stats tell you? As the game went on Howard struck out more, got on base and hit less, and just generally became less of a factor on the final outcome. Is that the kind of player you want to invest $15-20 mil. a year in? Even back in 2007 Howard hit just .223 in innings 7-9 and his strikeout numbers increased. Just for the sake of comparison, let’s take a look at Albert Pujols’ inning-by-inning hitting stats from 2008:

Innings 1-3 (207 AB): .406 (BA), .492 (OBP), 10 HR/45 RBI, 37 BB, 19 K

Innings 4-6 (166 AB): .301, .422, 14/41, 36, 19

Innings 7-9 (142 AB): .352, .472, 12/28, 31, 14

Innings 10+ (9 AB): .333, .333, 1/2, 0, 2

Pujols’ numbers through innings 4-9 are far superior to Howard’s, and while he generally doesn’t hit for quite as much power or drive in as many runs his other stats are much higher. As for RBI, keep in mind Pujols played for a worse offensive team so he had fewer chances to drive in runs than Howard did. Albert is set to make just over $14 million this season…Howard will make $15 million in the first year of his new contract (which jumps to $19 mil next year and $20 mil in 2011.) Who would you rather have on your team? Factor in that Pujols is a much better defensive player at 1B (.996 fielding percentage to Howard’s .988)  and you have yourself a REAL no-brainer.

Am I saying that Howard is a bad baseball player? Not at all, but what I am saying is he isn’t worth the $54 million he’ll now be making over the next three seasons. At least not until he learns to be a more consistent contributor to the team’s offense.

You might like these related articles:

  • mpr529

    sept/oct are when it matters and he proved he’s worth it in my book with that.

  • whatusayin

    Im sorry I love sports as much as the next guy but no athlete should be making millions of dollars just to play a sport

  • CStef

    I don’t know if he’s worth it or not. He is definatly a good baseball player, and a great power hitter. But when he’s off his game, he’ll be off for a while. He’s not the best first baseman in the world either. Don’t get me wrong, he’s a great team player and is good at what he does, but he needs to step up his defensive game a bit, and then I think he’ll be worth it.

  • Steve

    No way! Howard is not worth this.

  • http://the700level.com Kulp

    I don’t see how it matters, he was going to make that money any way you look at it. Even if he lost arbitration, he’ll still continue to perform and increase his value.

    It’s difficult to determine what his worth actually is. Is $18 mil too much? Probably, but the $14 mil the Phillies submitted put him below Pujols, Helton, and Berkman. Are Helton and Berkman worth more than Howard? (No point in comparing Teixeira.) I don’t know that you can make that case seeing as he won one MVP and was runner-up this past year, plus carried the club on their playoff run, leading to the eventual WFC.

    @ whatusayin: While I don’t necessarily disagree with that point, the players deserve that money because if they don’t get it, it just goes to the wealthy owners. Now maybe tickets, merchandise, and everything else should cost less, but unfortunately that’s not the kind of world we live in.

  • http://heardinthecheapseats.com/ Chris Iafolla

    It depends on how you evaluate the situation. From a standpoint based solely on economics, it was pretty much a no-brainer. The likelihood that Howard would earn at least that amount through arbitration was high. So, it makes sense for the Phils to lock him in at this rate–and believe it or not–it may save them a few million. Is he the caliber of player that is worth $18 million? Maybe so. Pujols’ contract is not an accurate barometer because it was signed at a different time and during a different time of his career. A better barometer would be Mark Texeria. Mark Texeria just signed a deal that will pay him $22.5 million per year. Who would you rather have? And if it is Texeria, is he $4.5 million better than Howard.

  • http://www.phinallyphilly.com/ David Foley

    Thanks for weighing in everyone. I’d have to say from the general consensus I am in the minority here, but that’s fine with me.

    Great Point Chris on comparing Howard’s contract to Pujols’. Seeing Tex sign that big deal (way too much money for a player of his caliber) does make Howard’s deal seem pretty fair, but then the question becomes: with the way the economy is, is it fiscally sensible to be giving these huge contracts anymore? At least Ryan’s deal is only for 3 years, but is ANY player worth $20 million a year anymore?

  • http://heardinthecheapseats.com/ Chris Iafolla

    If the current free agent market is any consenus the answer if only a handful are worth that price. But going back to your original point: it is almost like there should be two separate debates. Should the Phillies have done it and is he worth that much? Because the Phillies would have had him for three years through arbitration and probably would have paid this amount, I do think they needed to get this deal done. The price is almost irrelevant because in this case it was set.

    Now, is Howard worth the going price? Would I pay that amount if I were a GM bidding for Howard on the open market. Probably not.

  • Chris Gibson

    Very insightful article. I would be curious to see who the Phillies would’ve found to replace Howard (is there someone in the minors). It’s hard to replace his power numbers. That park is built for him. Also, can Howard improve his numbers? I think the notion of improvement from a KO perspective was too hard to pass up for the Phillies (not to mention that he is an icon in Philadelphia). He would be hard to let go although all of the author’s points would show otherwise.

blog comments powered by Disqus

About Us

Phinally Philly is a new source for news in the world of Philadelphia sports. Unlike other forms of mainstream media we take pride in presenting our honest, uncensored take on anything and everything related to Philly sports. We’re breaking news, insightful commentary, and a whole lot more brought to you live from the City of Brotherly Love by the Philly fan, for the Philly fan.